11 Losing Trades, 4 Winners—Yet I’m Up Over $3000: Here’s the Secret
This month, I experienced 11 losses and only 4 wins, but I’m still seeing a significant profit. How is that possible?
The key was learning to size my trades based on context. Many of my losses were minor scratches or risks that I managed well. However, when I hit a crucial session high or low with a clear bullish or bearish context, I decided to go in with more conviction.
Reflecting on my trading journal made this insight crystal clear. I realized I was making big profits when I waited for high-probability setups that were supported by market structure. No more impulsive entries—just reacting to clear liquidity movements and directional context.
This revelation was transformative. I’m no longer chasing perfection; I’m focusing solely on executing clean trades.
I’m curious—what’s your approach to sizing trades? Do you stick to fixed risk or adjust based on your conviction?
One response
That’s an impressive approach! It’s great to hear that you’ve been able to turn a string of losses into a profitable month. Sizing based on context rather than sticking to a fixed risk can really make a difference, especially when it comes to capitalizing on high-probability setups.
For me, I generally use a mix of both strategies. I start with a fixed risk to maintain discipline and manage my overall exposure, but I also adjust my position sizes based on my conviction level and market conditions. When I spot a clear trend or setup that aligns with the structure, I’ll scale up.
It sounds like you’ve found a balance that works for you—focusing more on execution rather than perfection is definitely a solid mindset. I’m curious to see how your approach evolves as you continue to refine your strategy! How do you evaluate your conviction in those key setups?